05-21-2019 02:34 AM - edited 05-21-2019 02:37 AM
Hi,
I'm using the BME280 for a project, and is having hard time converting the sensor's ADC temperature value into "human" readable temperature, the values always off. I'm not sure whether the issue is with the compensation equations or somewhere else. I'm able to write and read data back and forth between the BME280 sensor and the microcontroller.
Below are sample pictures of the I2C communication
Compensation Equations to convert raw ADC value into human readable temperature. For instance, the UT value at this moment in time is 0x00086b2b. After that value went throught the equations, the t_fine_temp value is 0x00000594 or 1428 in decimal which is 14.28 degree C which i think is incorrect. Unfortunately, i don't know what the correct value should be.
int32_t BME280_CalcT(int32_t UT) { #if 1 volatile sLWord t_fine_temp = 0x0000; volatile sLWord t_fine_temp2= 0x0000; //int32_t t_fine_temp3; //int32_t t_fine_1; #if 1 t_fine_temp = ((((UT >> 3) - ((sLWord)cal_param.dig_T1 << 1))) * ((sLWord)cal_param.dig_T2)) >> 11; t_fine_temp2 = (((((UT >> 4) - ((sLWord)cal_param.dig_T1)) * ((UT >> 4) - ((sLWord)cal_param.dig_T1))) >> 12) * ((sLWord)cal_param.dig_T3)) >> 14; t_fine_temp += t_fine_temp2; t_fine_temp = ((t_fine_temp * 5) + 128) >> 8; #endif return t_fine_temp; #endif }
cal_param 0x00000116 0x000116`Ram dig_T1 0x596f 0x000116`Ram dig_T2 0x1067 0x000118`Ram dig_T3 0x3200 0x00011a`Ram
Can anyone show me where thing went wrong ?
Thank you very much
Vu
05-21-2019 02:41 PM
05-23-2019 03:24 AM - edited 05-23-2019 03:25 AM
Hi,
Thanks for your help. Your excel spreadsheet verified that the equations i used to calcaulate the "human" readable temperature are indeed correct. Do you have any document or method to validate the calibration or the raw temperature values read from the BME280 sensor is valid ? Is the UT value 0x86B2B a valid number at a specific temperature ? Maybe 25 something degree C ?
Based on the "Raw Temp and Pressure" and "Read Calibration Values" images the calibration and temperature values look valid.
Thanks
Vu
05-23-2019 09:29 AM
05-23-2019 08:48 PM
Hi Vu, it looks like the 0x86B2B is a valid uncompensated temperature reading, but the calibration data has swapped msb and lsb data. Unlike the raw temperature data that is stored msb ahead of lsb, the calibration data seems to be lsb ahead of the msb. So instead of:
dig_T1 | 22895 |
dig_T2 | 4199 |
dig_T3 | 12800 |
It should be:
dig_T1 | 28505 |
dig_T2 | 26384 |
dig_T3 | 50 |
This gives a temperature of 30.09C. Is that more in line with what you expected?
It didn't matter for this calculation, but the spreadsheet has UP and UT measurement entries switched, based on where the data should be per the 1.6v 092018 data sheet.